Armis Logo< Back

CVE-2026-42468:

A buffer overflow vulnerability in Open Vehicle Monitoring System 3 (OVMS3) version 3.3.005 allows remote attackers to cause denial of service or execute arbitrary code through improper validation of the `phdr.len` field in `canformat_pcap.cpp`.


Score
Info
A numerical rating that indicates how dangerous this vulnerability is.

8.8High
  • Published Date:May 1, 2026
  • CISA KEV Date:*No Data*
  • Industries Affected:20

Threat Predictions

  • EPSS Score:0.1
  • EPSS Percentile:31%

Exploitability

  • Score:2.8
  • Attack Vector:NETWORK
  • Attack Complexity:LOW
  • Privileges Required:NONE
  • User Interaction:REQUIRED
  • Scope:UNCHANGED

Impact

  • Score:5.9
  • Confidentiality Impact:HIGH
  • Integrity Impact:HIGH
  • Availability Impact:HIGH

Description Preview

A buffer overflow vulnerability in Open Vehicle Monitoring System 3 (OVMS3) version 3.3.005 allows remote attackers to cause denial of service or execute arbitrary code through improper validation of the `phdr.len` field in `canformat_pcap.cpp`.

Overview

CVE-2026-42468 affects Open Vehicle Monitoring System 3 (OVMS3) version 3.3.005, a widely used open-source vehicle telemetry and monitoring platform. The vulnerability arises from insufficient validation of the `phdr.len` field within the PCAP format parsing logic in `canformat_pcap.cpp`. Because no upper-bound check is enforced on this field, a remote attacker can craft malicious PCAP data that triggers a stack-based buffer overflow. This can destabilize the system through denial of service or potentially enable arbitrary code execution, posing a significant risk to vehicle monitoring infrastructure that processes untrusted or externally sourced PCAP data.

Remediation

  • Users and administrators running OVMS3 version 3.3.005 should apply the following remediation steps. First, monitor the official OVMS3 GitHub repository for a patched release and upgrade as soon as one becomes available. Until a patch is applied, restrict access to any interfaces or services that accept PCAP input, ensuring only trusted sources can supply such data. Implement network-level controls such as firewalls or access control lists to limit exposure of the affected service to untrusted networks. Avoid processing PCAP files from unknown or unverified sources on vulnerable systems. Additionally, consider deploying runtime protections such as address space layout randomization (ASLR) and stack canaries where supported to reduce the risk of successful exploitation.

References

Industries Affected

Below is a list of industries most commonly impacted or potentially at risk based on intelligence.

Low
Mining icon
Mining
Utilities icon
Utilities
Information icon
Information
Construction icon
Construction
Retail Trade icon
Retail Trade
Manufacturing icon
Manufacturing
Wholesale Trade icon
Wholesale Trade
Educational Services icon
Educational Services
Finance and Insurance icon
Finance and Insurance
Public Administration icon
Public Administration
Real Estate Rental and Leasing icon
Real Estate Rental and Leasing
Transportation and Warehousing icon
Transportation and Warehousing
Accommodation and Food Services icon
Accommodation and Food Services
Health Care and Social Assistance icon
Health Care and Social Assistance
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation icon
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Management of Companies and Enterprises icon
Management of Companies and Enterprises
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting icon
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting
Other Services (except Public Administration) icon
Other Services (except Public Administration)
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services icon
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services icon
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services

Focus on What Matters

See everything.Identify true risk.Proactively mitigate threats.Book a Demo

Let's talk!