CVE-2015-1991:CVE-2015-1991 was rejected and should not be used as an identifier; it was created in IBM's CNA pool in 2015 but was not assigned to any real vulnerability.

splash
Back

Description Preview

CVE-2015-1991 originated as a candidate in IBM's CNA pool but was rejected on 2018-07-16 because the candidate was never assigned to any issue. Consequently, there are no published vulnerability details, affected products, exploit vectors, or mitigations associated with this entry. Organizations should avoid referencing this CVE in advisories or security notices and should rely on validated CVEs issued by MITRE/NVD.

Overview

The CVE entry CVE-2015-1991 was created as part of IBM’s CNA process but was subsequently rejected after being deemed not associated with any actual vulnerability. It was placed in a CNA pool in 2015 and remained unassigned to any issue, with the rejection recorded in July 2018. As a result, there are no reliable vulnerability details to assess, and this identifier should not be used in security communications.

Remediation

  • There are no remediation steps for a rejected CVE since no vulnerability was associated with it.
  • Do not reference this CVE in advisories or security notices.
  • If you encounter this CVE in documentation or reports, replace it with validated, active CVEs from MITRE/NVD.
  • Audit existing vulnerability records to remove or deprecate references to this identifier, and ensure status is reflected as REJECTED in your systems.

References

Industry ExposureMost to least
This section illustrates the prevalence of a specific Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) across various industries based on customer reports. The ranking displays industries from the most to least affected by this particular vulnerability, offering valuable insight into where this CVE has been most frequently observed. This information can help organizations within these sectors prioritize their security efforts, understand their relative risk exposure compared to their peers, and focus remediation strategies where they are most needed. By understanding the industry-specific impact, organizations can make more informed decisions regarding patching, resource allocation, and overall risk management related to this CVE.

  1. Accommodation & Food Services: Low
    Accommodation & Food Services
  2. Administrative, Support, Waste Management & Remediation Services: Low
    Administrative, Support, Waste Management & Remediation Services
  3. Agriculture, Forestry Fishing & Hunting: Low
    Agriculture, Forestry Fishing & Hunting
  4. Arts, Entertainment & Recreation: Low
    Arts, Entertainment & Recreation
  5. Construction: Low
    Construction
  6. Educational Services: Low
    Educational Services
  7. Finance and Insurance: Low
    Finance and Insurance
  8. Health Care & Social Assistance: Low
    Health Care & Social Assistance
  9. Information: Low
    Information
  10. Management of Companies & Enterprises: Low
    Management of Companies & Enterprises
  11. Manufacturing: Low
    Manufacturing
  12. Mining: Low
    Mining
  13. Other Services (except Public Administration): Low
    Other Services (except Public Administration)
  14. Professional, Scientific, & Technical Services: Low
    Professional, Scientific, & Technical Services
  15. Public Administration: Low
    Public Administration
  16. Real Estate Rental & Leasing: Low
    Real Estate Rental & Leasing
  17. Retail Trade: Low
    Retail Trade
  18. Transportation & Warehousing: Low
    Transportation & Warehousing
  19. Utilities: Low
    Utilities
  20. Wholesale Trade: Low
    Wholesale Trade

Focus on What Matters

  1. See Everything.
  2. Identify True Risk.
  3. Proactively Mitigate Threats.

Let's talk!

background