CVE-2017-2002:CVE-2017-2002 is an unassigned CVE identifier that was never used for any vulnerability.

splash
Back

Description Preview

This CVE ID was part of a pool of identifiers allocated to a CNA (CVE Numbering Authority) but was not assigned to any actual security vulnerability during 2017. The entry has been formally rejected and should not be referenced in security documentation or vulnerability management systems.

Overview

CVE-2017-2002 is a rejected CVE identifier that was never associated with any actual security vulnerability. This identifier was part of a block of CVE IDs that were reserved by IBM (as indicated by the ASSIGNER field) but ultimately not used during the 2017 allocation period. When CVE IDs are reserved but not used, they are typically marked as rejected with an explanation like this to prevent confusion and maintain the integrity of the CVE database.

Remediation

No remediation is required as this is not an actual vulnerability. Organizations should:

  • Remove any references to this CVE ID from security documentation
  • Update vulnerability management systems to ignore this identifier
  • Use other valid CVE IDs for tracking actual vulnerabilities

References

No official references are available for this CVE ID as it was never assigned to an actual vulnerability. For information about the CVE program and how identifiers are assigned and managed, users can refer to:

  • MITRE CVE website: https://cve.mitre.org/
  • CVE Numbering Authorities (CNAs): https://www.cve.org/ProgramOrganization/CNAs
  • IBM PSIRT (the listed assigner): https://www.ibm.com/security/secure-engineering/process.html

Industry ExposureMost to least
This section illustrates the prevalence of a specific Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) across various industries based on customer reports. The ranking displays industries from the most to least affected by this particular vulnerability, offering valuable insight into where this CVE has been most frequently observed. This information can help organizations within these sectors prioritize their security efforts, understand their relative risk exposure compared to their peers, and focus remediation strategies where they are most needed. By understanding the industry-specific impact, organizations can make more informed decisions regarding patching, resource allocation, and overall risk management related to this CVE.

  1. Accommodation & Food Services
    Accommodation & Food Services
  2. Administrative, Support, Waste Management & Remediation Services
    Administrative, Support, Waste Management & Remediation Services
  3. Agriculture, Forestry Fishing & Hunting
    Agriculture, Forestry Fishing & Hunting
  4. Arts, Entertainment & Recreation
    Arts, Entertainment & Recreation
  5. Construction
    Construction
  6. Educational Services
    Educational Services
  7. Finance and Insurance
    Finance and Insurance
  8. Health Care & Social Assistance
    Health Care & Social Assistance
  9. Information
    Information
  10. Management of Companies & Enterprises
    Management of Companies & Enterprises
  11. Manufacturing
    Manufacturing
  12. Mining
    Mining
  13. Other Services (except Public Administration)
    Other Services (except Public Administration)
  14. Professional, Scientific, & Technical Services
    Professional, Scientific, & Technical Services
  15. Public Administration
    Public Administration
  16. Real Estate Rental & Leasing
    Real Estate Rental & Leasing
  17. Retail Trade
    Retail Trade
  18. Transportation & Warehousing
    Transportation & Warehousing
  19. Utilities
    Utilities
  20. Wholesale Trade
    Wholesale Trade

Focus on What Matters

  1. See Everything.
  2. Identify True Risk.
  3. Proactively Mitigate Threats.

Let's talk!

background