CVE-2018-1745:IBM Security Key Lifecycle Manager versions 2.7 and 3.0 allow an unauthenticated user to restart the SKLM server due to missing authentication (CVE-2018-1745).

splash
Back

Description Preview

IBM Security Key Lifecycle Manager versions 2.7 and 3.0 are affected by a vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated user to restart the SKLM server due to missing authentication. This vulnerability has been assigned CVE-2018-1745 and has a CVSS base score of 7.5, indicating a high severity issue. The impact of this vulnerability is classified as high in terms of availability, with a low attack complexity and no privileges required for exploitation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability over the network without user interaction, potentially leading to a denial of service condition.

Overview

The vulnerability in IBM Security Key Lifecycle Manager versions 2.7 and 3.0 allows an unauthenticated user to restart the SKLM server due to missing authentication. This vulnerability has a CVSS base score of 7.5, indicating a high severity issue with a high impact on availability.

Remediation

To remediate this vulnerability, users of affected versions (2.7 and 3.0) of IBM Security Key Lifecycle Manager should apply the official fix provided by IBM. It is recommended to update to a patched version that addresses the authentication bypass issue to prevent unauthorized server restarts. Users should follow the guidance provided by IBM to apply the necessary security updates.

References

  1. IBM X-Force ID: 148424 - Link
  2. CVE-2018-1745 on SecurityFocus - Link
  3. IBM Security Key Lifecycle Manager Support Page - Link

Industry ExposureMost to least
This section illustrates the prevalence of a specific Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) across various industries based on customer reports. The ranking displays industries from the most to least affected by this particular vulnerability, offering valuable insight into where this CVE has been most frequently observed. This information can help organizations within these sectors prioritize their security efforts, understand their relative risk exposure compared to their peers, and focus remediation strategies where they are most needed. By understanding the industry-specific impact, organizations can make more informed decisions regarding patching, resource allocation, and overall risk management related to this CVE.

  1. Accommodation & Food Services
    Accommodation & Food Services
  2. Administrative, Support, Waste Management & Remediation Services
    Administrative, Support, Waste Management & Remediation Services
  3. Agriculture, Forestry Fishing & Hunting
    Agriculture, Forestry Fishing & Hunting
  4. Arts, Entertainment & Recreation
    Arts, Entertainment & Recreation
  5. Construction
    Construction
  6. Educational Services
    Educational Services
  7. Finance and Insurance
    Finance and Insurance
  8. Health Care & Social Assistance
    Health Care & Social Assistance
  9. Information
    Information
  10. Management of Companies & Enterprises
    Management of Companies & Enterprises
  11. Manufacturing
    Manufacturing
  12. Mining
    Mining
  13. Other Services (except Public Administration)
    Other Services (except Public Administration)
  14. Professional, Scientific, & Technical Services
    Professional, Scientific, & Technical Services
  15. Public Administration
    Public Administration
  16. Real Estate Rental & Leasing
    Real Estate Rental & Leasing
  17. Retail Trade
    Retail Trade
  18. Transportation & Warehousing
    Transportation & Warehousing
  19. Utilities
    Utilities
  20. Wholesale Trade
    Wholesale Trade

Focus on What Matters

  1. See Everything.
  2. Identify True Risk.
  3. Proactively Mitigate Threats.

Let's talk!

background